On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:01 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 02:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 19:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:50:46PM -0500, Mike Cronenworth wrote: > > > > If Fedora's supposed target is a "regular desktop user" they will want to > > > > > > I hope that hasn't become the only target while I wasn't looking. > > I regret having to say so, but I find this to be an apparent fact. > > > > A lost of what is being sold as "great achievements in Fedora" is > > desktop centric and lacks generality. Some pieces are even close to be > > unusable outside of desktops (e.g. NM, PA, SELinux). > > SELinux? You have to be kidding, aren't you? Nope, absolutely not. The selinux-policies in Fedora 8 by no means fit into my network's usage (nfs mounted homes, automount, networked printers, write access for individual users to /var/ftp/<....>), as well as I don't see that this selinux-applet (sorry, don't recall its correct name) is useful. After having played with Fedora 8/selinux policies for several months, having fought with many false alarms, I came to the conclusion that selinux is not ready for use in a network and switched it off. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
