On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:03 -0200, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > Tomas Mraz wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 06:23 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:01:15AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > >>>> desktop centric and lacks generality. Some pieces are even close to be > >>>> unusable outside of desktops (e.g. NM, PA, SELinux). > >>> SELinux? You have to be kidding, aren't you? > >> Show me an in-production server doing anything slightly out of the bounds of > >> the expected, and I'll show you a machine with SELinux turned off. :) > > > > That it is not yet super-easy to use SELinux on servers doesn't mean > > that it is unusable. It is perfectly possible to use it on most servers > > but it of course requires some effort from the sysadmin to learn it. > > Really, adding */sbin/ to PATH or individual commands should be no > different, right? I do not argue with you at all. I do not think that */sbin should be added to user's PATH by default. My vote is for moving/symlinking commands which are useful for regular users. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list