On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:00 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 23:46 +0200, Jean-François Martin wrote: > > Le mardi 22 avril 2008 à 16:25 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 16:08 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > > Two changes have recently been made to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. > > > > > > > > Specifically: > > > > > > > > The main Fedora Packaging Guidelines now has a section which forbids packages > > > > to own files or directories under /srv. This new section can be found here: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#NoFilesOrDirectoriesUnderSrv > > > > > > > > As a reminder, any Fedora packages which are currently owning files or directories > > > > under /srv need to be fixed before the release of Fedora 10. > > > > > > Or what? And who's going to verify that? > > > > > yum whatprovides /srv/* ? > > That's a way to detect packages yes. My question was more directed at > what happens to packages that aren't fixed and _who_ is actually going > to verify they are fixed. Not how. I volunteered to audit packages for compliance in the F10 cycle. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
