On 20.04.2008 15:28, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:47:18PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> I'd say it is highly likely that it was reviewed back then as we >> reviewed packages that were moved from FC to FE back then -- but that >> was likely before we used bugzilla for reviewing. > My recalling are different. I remember that, at some point, Core packages > could go to Extras without review. This was changed afterward, but it is > possible that gnumeric was never seriously reviewed. IIRC that was only the case for a very very short time. And even those IIRC were re-reviewed later as during the merge someone looked up reviews for all packages as filed re-reviews for those that were not reviewed. I for one think we should not care much in any case -- the package is maintained by a trusted and experienced packager. Fedora has way bigger problems to solve. Cu knurd P.S.: Hans at least tried to get a review: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-March/msg00259.html But I couldn't quickly find a "approved" mail. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
