Re: Mono Package audit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "PG" == Peter Gordon  writes:

PG> [Forgive me if this has already been reported. I could not find a
PG> relevant entry for against the 'blam' component in Fedora's
PG> Bugzilla.]

PG> FYI, Blam currently includes binary DLLs, too:

PG> blam-1.8.3/lib/Atom.NET.dll blam-1.8.3/lib/RSS.NET.dll

PG> These have no corresponding source code in the Blam
PG> tree. Unfortunately, too, their respective upstream projects seem
PG> dead (last updated in 2004 and 2005, respectively). These will
PG> need to be built from the upstream sources if possible. (This was
PG> one reason that I orphaned it back in February.)

PG> CC-ing Alex on this, as Blam's current maintainer.  

I'm currently working on updating/fixing blam to 1.8.5/1.8.6 which
doesn't contain the Atom.NET.dll any more.  1.8.6 also dropped the
RSS.NET.dll, which means it will build entirely from source, see:

http://www.cmartin.tk/blam.html

Currently the issue with rawhide is getting blam to build against
the newest xulrunner, see: 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434382

Alex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux