Re: Mono Package audit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Forgive me if this has already been reported. I could not find a
relevant entry for against the 'blam' component in Fedora's Bugzilla.]

FYI, Blam currently includes binary DLLs, too: 

blam-1.8.3/lib/Atom.NET.dll
blam-1.8.3/lib/RSS.NET.dll

These have no corresponding source code in the Blam tree. Unfortunately,
too, their respective upstream projects seem dead (last updated in 2004
and 2005, respectively). These will need to be built from the upstream
sources if possible. (This was one reason that I orphaned it back in
February.)

CC-ing Alex on this, as Blam's current maintainer. 
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
  

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux