Re: Xfce SIG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:18:53 -0500
mike@xxxxxxxxxx (Mike Cronenworth) wrote:

> Hi Kevin,
> 
> I was thinking about this for a while, and I would like to show my
> interest.

Excellent. 

> You may or may not remember me from the times I've emailed you about 
> XFCE, but I am a full time XFCE user. I've also dabbed at directly 
> communicating with the XFCE group (bug reports, etc). Unfortunately
> my time for actual coding is light, so I may not be able to be
> productive but I would like to be involved.

Every bit helps. ;) 

> Also something to consider is to reach out to the XFCE group and the 
> Xubutnu group to collaborate more uniformly. It seems that the
> Xubuntu group rarely talks to the XFCE group, and the XFCE group
> rarely speaks to anyone outside. XFCE has good design models in place
> and it would be a shame for KDE and Gnome to keep this good project
> buried in publicity.

Yeah, it would be good for everyone to work closely with upstream. :)

Lets see if there is enough interest for a SIG here, and no matter
what, please do keep reporting bugs and helping when and where you can. 
All contributions welcome. 

> Regards,
> Mike

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux