> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway >>> <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote: >>>> > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need >>>> that flag here: >>>> > >>>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639 >>>> > >>>> > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but >>>> that >>>> > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora >>>> > EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when >>>> pressing >>>> > the "Help" button, either. >>>> >>>> Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave? >>> Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review >>> bug, which would only live on the Fedora side? >> >> In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following >> scenarios: >> >> 1. Package only lives in EPEL >> 2. No master review bug exists. >> > I am somewhat inclined to disagree with a package living only in EPEL. > EPEL packages are Fedora packages built and/or modified for Enterprise > Linux. > > If someone would like to code it, or even just provide a mockup (where > it belongs in the URL hierarchy, form elements, who should be allowed > etc), there's an open ticket to do this via the packagedb in the future. > Having the fields added to a web form means that cvsadmins wouldn't > have to spend time cut and pasting the values which would be greatly > appreciated by all the cvsadmins I know. I changed the bug to rawhide, and it's fine now. Thanks, all! > -Toshio > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
