Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
I am somewhat inclined to disagree with a package living only in EPEL. EPEL packages are Fedora packages built and/or modified for Enterprise Linux.On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need that flag here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639 > > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but that > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora > EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when pressing > the "Help" button, either. Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following scenarios: 1. Package only lives in EPEL 2. No master review bug exists.
If someone would like to code it, or even just provide a mockup (where it belongs in the URL hierarchy, form elements, who should be allowed etc), there's an open ticket to do this via the packagedb in the future. Having the fields added to a web form means that cvsadmins wouldn't have to spend time cut and pasting the values which would be greatly appreciated by all the cvsadmins I know.
-Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
