On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 19:28 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > What about third-party repositories like rpmfusion? AFAICT, rpmfusion decided > to use Plague. And looking at the current design of the 2 tools, Plague looks > much more appropriate for a third-party repository to me, compared to Koji > which wants to "own" the entire distribution, requiring to import all the base > Fedora packages. Of course, the work to make Koji suitable for EPEL may well > make this a non-issue, but right now it is something to consider. The method by which Koji is made usable for EPEL may also make it useable by rpmfusion et al. Removing the need to "own" every package. If/when that comes, rpmfusion can make the decision to base their buildsystem off of software that has an active upstream and rather important downstream (Red Hat) or something which has no upstream, and not much downstream. Or rpmfusion folks can take over as upstream for plague and maintain it. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
