On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 00:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > It's 100% nuts that the BuildRoot tag even exists. This is something > that could and should be handled by intelligence inside rpmbuild, > with no need to try to herd developers into agreeing on whatever the > theory-of-the-month is. > > Expecting specfiles to rm -rf the buildroot is just as stupid. > > I don't grasp why anyone is thinking that hundreds (thousands?) of > Fedora developers should deal with these things, rather than fixing it > once in RPM itself. +1 Exchanging ugly for a slightly different sort of ugly brokenness is a futile waste of time. Either fix it right, or don't bother.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
