Re: Packaging Guidelines: Why so lax for BuildRoot?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:

> Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> From a security standpoint, all those variants are flawed though (even
>> the mktemp is subject to a race condition), there is a proposal by
>> Lubomir Kundrak to fix the mess:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SecureBuildRoot
>> but so far it's just a proposal.
> 
> It's 100% nuts that the BuildRoot tag even exists.  This is something
> that could and should be handled by intelligence inside rpmbuild

Of course, but until rpmbuild is fixed, you gotta make do with what you've
got.

-- Rex


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux