On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My only reason for mentioning more stable distributions was to point out that what happens in fedora doesn't stay in fedora - it affects a lot of people for a long time.
You continue to miss the point. What you meant to say was...
What happens in Yum upstream development doesn't just stay in Yum upstream development, it affects a lot of people for a long time. Fedora is just a front line consumer of what yum upstream is doing..but Fedora is not yum upstream. Just as Fedora is a front line consumer of something larger like gnome. In a previous post, you were asked to move your issues with yum development to yum's upstream communication channels.
-jef"How do we draw a brighter line between Fedora as a downstream consumer of cross-distribution projects? How do we better educate people concerning when its appropriate to drive discussion upstream versus encouraging Fedora specific discussion on the matter? I think I need a longer, sharper eye-poking stick."spaleta
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
