Re: Feature or bug? (strange?) yum behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/4/2, James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>  On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:36 +0200, Mark wrote:
>  >  What i was saying
>  > here is that yum first needs to download/update it's local data to
>  > tell something that it could have easily done with rpm -q gimp.
>
>
>  For:
>
>   yum list installed gimp
>
>  ...current upstream is now fixed and won't download/update the repo.
>  metadata, "yum list installed" hasn't for a long time but any extra
>  args. broke the test (and yes, this would have been better as a BZ ...
>  but thanks anyway :).
>

BZ's are (nearly) always better but i wasn't sure yet if it was a bug
(like the title of this topic says).

And no problem.
Thanx for fixing it.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux