On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:01 PM, John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote > > Or do J5 have different view about this?, both idea ( improve MyFedora > > / improve PackageDB ) sounds okay to me, just that I feel that if > > MyFedora implements those features, PackageDB and the effort made for > > it previously would be rendered of no-use (or perhaps thats what one > > of MyFedora's goal - to obsolete packagedb ) .. > > There is a balance here. For everything I have to pull from there is a > cost in terms of calls I have to make to different backends per page > along with the extra work to recreate the GUI for each module. The > different backends are taking a tools centric approach to manipulating > data where as My Fedora takes a more data centric approach (here is the > data how would I like to manipulate and display). I agree the data side In other words, instead of calling interfaces provided by these backends (which is, obviously, more costly) , MyFedora will be directly access the databases and manipulate the data to be in a more user-centric and useful views (am I right?). > of it should be part of PackageDB but unless someone really wants to > work on a separate PackageDB UI I would just have that be a simple dump > of the database in a slightly nicer form. > > In any case my thoughts on the subject are logged somewhere else in the > thread where I talk about Apps vs. Packages and how a separate app would > look different from a My Fedora app. Read there. I couldnt find the thread, is it in this list or another list?. iirc i've read it before. an App may have multiple Packages. > > -- > > > John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -- Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail Amano Hikaru 天野晃 「あまの ひかる」 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MohdIzharFirdaus http://blog.kagesenshi.org 92C2 B295 B40B B3DC 6866 5011 5BD2 584A 8A5D 7331 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
