On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:30 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:43:45AM -0700, Andrew Farris wrote: > > Andrew Farris wrote: > >> No, it meant F9 development was begun and rawhide was branched away from > >> F8 on that date; it meant rawhide could be messed with without effecting > >> F8. > > > > Wow, sorry disregard this TV-while-typing nonsense (I should answer > > questions I think about and know the answer for). I think that what you > > said Axel would be correct, in that dist-f10 should be available for > > packages to branch to after april 8 but rawhide will stay dist-f9 until > > release date. But any changes made in 'rawhide' or dist-f9 branches would > > still effect f9. But someone clearly needs to confirm what I just said... > > Actually what I want to know is when could I start committing/building > in CVS' devel w/o hurting F9. Now, if you do an early branch request. April 8 if you want to wait. > More specificially I wanted to submit freenx-server/client packages, > which while still close to the old packaged "freenx" could carry some > new bugs which I'd like some rawhide/updates-testing time to sort out. Well, there's a problem there. Even after the branching occurs, your builds won't hit rawhide as that is composed from the dist-f9 tags still. So dist-f10 builds will be queued in koji and can be gotten from there, but it won't hit a wider audience until after F9 is released. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list