Andrew Farris wrote:
No, it meant F9 development was begun and rawhide was branched away from F8 on that date; it meant rawhide could be messed with without effecting F8.
Wow, sorry disregard this TV-while-typing nonsense (I should answer questions I think about and know the answer for). I think that what you said Axel would be correct, in that dist-f10 should be available for packages to branch to after april 8 but rawhide will stay dist-f9 until release date. But any changes made in 'rawhide' or dist-f9 branches would still effect f9. But someone clearly needs to confirm what I just said...
-- Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3 No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer ---- ---- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
