Andrew Farris wrote:
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:Joachim Backes wrote:I my actual F8, I have 2 disk devices: One Sata-Disk: /dev/sda, and 1 IDE-Disk: /dev/sdb. But in F9 Beta, these two disks seem to be interchanged (/dev/sda <--> /dev/sdb). Is this true, and if yes, why?Should drive detection change from alpha to beta? Does it really make any differnce?RegardsF9 Beta changed my drive sequence from 360GB ide (sda) + 3 160GB satas (sdb..d) to 3 160GB satas (sda..c) + 360GB ide (sdd). Since I use LVs and labels, the only issue was the bios boot sequence which anaconda ignored and I fixed during boot configuration during install.F9 alpha, F8, unity and centos all saw the drive sequences the same and bios boot sequence was correct.F9 beta should not have changed anything at all to do with your bios boot sequence... did you not install the bootloader to your MBR but instead to your partition?
I installed to the MBR. The change in order once the kernel is loaded is easily
understandable, but it should not effect how your machine reacts prior to the kernel loading.
-- Joachim Backes <joachim.backes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> University of Kaiserslautern,Computer Center [RHRK], Systems and Operations, High Performance Computing, D-67653 Kaiserslautern, PO Box 3049, Germany -------------------------------------------------- Phone: +49-631-205-2438, FAX: +49-631-205-3056
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
