Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
I my actual F8, I have 2 disk devices: One Sata-Disk: /dev/sda, and 1
IDE-Disk: /dev/sdb.
But in F9 Beta, these two disks seem to be interchanged (/dev/sda <-->
/dev/sdb). Is this true, and if yes, why?
Regards
Should drive detection change from alpha to beta? Does it really make
any differnce?
F9 Beta changed my drive sequence from 360GB ide (sda) + 3 160GB satas
(sdb..d) to 3 160GB satas (sda..c) + 360GB ide (sdd). Since I use LVs
and labels, the only issue was the bios boot sequence which anaconda
ignored and I fixed during boot configuration during install.
F9 alpha, F8, unity and centos all saw the drive sequences the same and
bios boot sequence was correct.
F9 beta should not have changed anything at all to do with your bios boot
sequence... did you not install the bootloader to your MBR but instead to
your partition? The change in order once the kernel is loaded is easily
understandable, but it should not effect how your machine reacts prior to
the kernel loading.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
