On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:38 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:32 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Nah.. why take the simple way. In fact.. why have /bin and /usr/bin.. > > no one who counts really uses them as seperate things? We should just > > have everything in one or the other. I mean put everything in /bin > > that is executable. Create a /share and we don't really need /usr > > anymore either. > > Since nobody else has played the standards cop >;) ... > > RedHat is LSB compliant. LSB requires FHS compliance. FHS dictates > where stuff goes. I suppose you could submit a patch upstream ;) FHS compliance mandates that /sbin and /usr/sbin exist and that specific files exist in each. You can comply with the FHS by having symlinks for those specific files. Also - being FHS and LSB compliant is not mandatory. Providing a single rpm which provided FHS-compliance would be fairly trivial. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
