Jonathan Underwood (jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Because it's changing 500 packages, and you can't do the replacement > > sanely in RPM anyway. > > Surely a large proportion of those 500 packages will be rebuilt in the > F-10 release cycle anyway? However, I don't understand the second > point you make there? To do a full /sbin -> /bin migration, you'd need to: 1) Rebuild all packages to change paths 2) Maintain a list of things that are commonly referenced by third-party/local scripts by path 3) Build a package that provides those symlinks I fail to see how this is more efficient than just modifying $PATH. (Actually I fail to see what horribly necessary commands are causing this to be a big issue, but that's beside the point.) You can't just symlink /sbin to /bin, because that will blow up RPM very badly. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
