On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:32 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Nah.. why take the simple way. In fact.. why have /bin and /usr/bin.. > no one who counts really uses them as seperate things? We should just > have everything in one or the other. I mean put everything in /bin > that is executable. Create a /share and we don't really need /usr > anymore either. > I'll be the first to bite, then: I really don't care/like/give-a-crap about /sbin or /bin - it's a vague and silly distinction. as a user I want commands to be in my path. I don't give a flying fig where they live. As far as /usr is concerned that's a giant 'shrug'. We need a place to shove a bunch of stuff /usr is just as good as anything else. I grok the nfs-mount /usr routine for the distinction b/t things in / and things /usr. That's fine. But nothing about the [/usr]/sbin and [/usr]/bin distinction makes any sense anymore. Permissions and acls go to the file layer. We can work just fine w/o them. the need for it is kaput. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
