On Tuesday 25 March 2008 05:37:27 pm Don Dutile wrote: > is there still an i686-PAE variant, and if so, is that distinguished in > the kernel naming below ? Yep, there's still an i686 PAE, and it looks like so: # uname -r 2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE /boot/config-2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE /boot/initrd-2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE.img /boot/System.map-2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE /lib/modules/2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE /usr/src/kernels/2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686PAE /usr/src/kernels/2.6.25-0.154.rc6.git7.fc9.i686-PAE (Yes, both, there's a symlink created for historical reasons I'm not actually aware of)... So basically, everything just keys off of what uname -r is now, where before, we were uname -r everywhere except the bits in /usr/src/kernels, which were '$(uname -r)-$(uname -m)'. > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > So we had a bug filed a while ago, requesting the ability to install the > > same kernel version of different arches on the same system with the same > > /boot partition: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197065 > > > > To do that, we've made some changes that should be transparent to most > > users, save those that are building external kernel modules. [...] -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
