On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 March 2008 at 19:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:08:56AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This "well my system is ok, screw everyone else" approach is what I find > > > > > so fundamentally broken in this idea. Especially as the people advocating > > > > > for this aren't those who get to deal with the fallout when users start > > > > > filing bugs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe the stated goal is to package things in such a way that Alexandre > > > > can then propose a separate spin that is libre by his definition. but has > > > > the potential to carry the Fedora marks. > > > > > > And then when people download that spin, and find their computer doesn't boot, > > > who gets the bug reports ? > > > > > > > I would figure they would need to go to that spin's SIG/Committee. And > > the opening anaconda should clearly say that: > > > > Attempting to boot libre kernel. This will only work on hardware that > > is completely open and documented. All other hardware will be > > problematic. Contact kernel-libre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for more messages, > > and open bugs under FEDORA-LIBRE in bugzilla.fedorahosted.org. > > Most people won't bother to read this or will forget this 5 minutes into > the installation process. > Most people don't bother to read anything. I know, I worked in support for years. However, common stupidity is not an excuse to say Alexandre can't form a SIG to for his specialized Spin. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
