On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:08:56AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This "well my system is ok, screw everyone else" approach is what I find > > so fundamentally broken in this idea. Especially as the people advocating > > for this aren't those who get to deal with the fallout when users start > > filing bugs. > > > > I believe the stated goal is to package things in such a way that Alexandre > can then propose a separate spin that is libre by his definition. but has > the potential to carry the Fedora marks. And then when people download that spin, and find their computer doesn't boot, who gets the bug reports ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
