Once upon a time, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > On Mar 23, 2008, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fedora also strongly pushes "upstream, upstream, upstream" > > Except when there are bits in the project that Fedora can't or doesn't > want to ship. We do omit patent-encumbered bits from sources of > various Free Software projects. This is no different, except that, > instead of patent encumbrances, the issue is absence of corresponding > source code. But that is not in conflict with Fedora's stance; Fedora ships other binary firmware already. Fedora doesn't need a second kernel that strips out things that are already in accordance with Fedora's goals. I don't see any reason for Fedora to ship multiple kernels to satisfy someone that disagrees with the stated goals of Fedora. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
