Re: Suggestion Next Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:41:59AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 13:42 -0500, Diego Escobar wrote:
> 
> >  
> >      1. Yum is working good... but if it could be faster...(Especially
> >         solving dependencies) nobody will unhappy. 
> 
> 
> How about 2x-3x faster for depsolving and 1/3rd as much memory used? Is
> that better? If so, it's already done in rawhide.

Of course there's a bit of chicken & egg problem here. Users won't notice
the speed/memusage improvements during the big update from F8 to F9 (if 
doing a live in-place upgrade) because that will be done using the F8 
version of YUM. One of the interesting features of the RHN client was
that the first thing it did was look to see if there was an update of 
itself, apply that and then re-exec itself to do the rest of the upgrade.
So the bulk of work for any package upgrade was always done with latest
update client.

Dan.
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux