On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 01:56 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > One counterproductive effect I see this decision having is that SIGs involved > with such technologies will avoid even _mentioning_ the word "guidelines", lest > FPC and FESCo will block all their packages until they're ready. So in the long > term, that'll mean _less_ specific guidelines, not more, which I assume is > entirely against the interest of those who voted for this resolution. > > The way you encourage new guidelines is to make life easy for those working on > them. Holding all their packages until the guideline is finalized is the exact > opposite. Hooray for blowing things entirely out of proportion. I urge you to read spot's mail on this subject closely and then make an informed opinion. Please don't re-interpret our decisions to be the most ridiculous meaning possible. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
