Re: 3.6% of heads up: Please correct your #includes or optflags use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 14:52 +0100, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:

> Should you find any errors, or have comments or questions, don't
> hesitate to mail me.

cdparanoia appears to be a false positive:

ketamine:/redhat/core/cdparanoia/devel% grep ^gcc .build-alpha9.8-29.log | grep -v FORTIFY_SOURCE       
gcc -fpic -shared -o libcdda_interface.so.0.9.8 -Wl,-soname -Wl,libcdda_interface.so.0 scan_devices.o	common_interface.o cooked_interface.o interface.o scsi_interface.o smallft.o toc.o test_interface.o -lm
gcc -fpic -shared -o libcdda_paranoia.so.0.9.8 -Wl,-soname -Wl,libcdda_paranoia.so.0 paranoia.o p_block.o overlap.o gap.o isort.o -L ../interface -lcdda_interface

Unless I'm wildly mistaken, -DFOO on the command line when invoking gcc
as a fancy frontend to ld should have no effect.

There are some implicit function declarations, which I've fixed, but
memcmp() and exit() aren't fortified functions, and aren't the functions
your test warned about anyway.

- ajax

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux