On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 11:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:17:15AM +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > There are a bunch of packages blocking F-GUIDELINES on the ground of being Java > > packages and the Java guidelines not being finalized. Yet there are another > > bunch of Java packages which have been in Fedora for years. This is > > inconsistent and just generally doesn't make sense. If what we have now is good > > enough for all the existing packages, why wouldn't it be for new ones? And once > > the guidelines are finalized, the packages can always be fixed to conform to > > them. > > I understand your reasoning, I have pleaded the same on the packaging list, but > without results. So now I've volunteered to pick up working on the java > guidelines and beating them into shape. Unfortunately I haven't found any time > for this sofar. Can you give a pointer to (or explain) what the outstanding issues with the current draft guidelines are? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
