Re: Java packages, guidelines, ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 01:17:15AM +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
There are a bunch of packages blocking F-GUIDELINES on the ground of being Java packages and the Java guidelines not being finalized. Yet there are another bunch of Java packages which have been in Fedora for years. This is inconsistent and just generally doesn't make sense. If what we have now is good enough for all the existing packages, why wouldn't it be for new ones? And once the guidelines are finalized, the packages can always be fixed to conform to them.

I understand your reasoning, I have pleaded the same on the packaging list, but without results. So now I've volunteered to pick up working on the java guidelines and beating them into shape. Unfortunately I haven't found any time for this sofar.

I really think that it would be better to spend time creating proper guidelines, then it would be to spend time discussion wether or not those guidelines are needed.

So are there any volunteers for helping me with the guidelines?

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux