On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 13:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Sure, also a plan. At PK build time we still have to get this > > > information and ship it in a tarball - else we don't get any data for > > > not-yet-installed applications. > > > > why not just request that the various pkg managers be able to retrieve > > this information so PK can request it rather than having ANOTHER set of > > metadata downloads? > > Isn't this specspo all over again, i.e., bad no matter which way you > slice it? yes, but not maintained in an rpm we have to ship around to get updates. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
