Re: mock 0.9 backport to F7/F8 -- Feb 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael E Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:24:50PM -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Michael E Brown wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:11:33AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 4:49 PM,  <Michael_E_Brown@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> All mock users,
>>>>>
>>>>>      The mock maintainers (Clark, Jesse, me) will upgrade mock in F7/F8 to current 0.9 on/around Feb 1.
>>>>>
>>>>>      The mock 0.9 branch has brewed in rawhide since early Dec, and so far it looks good. The 0.9 branch is now being used on the official build systems, so if there were any major problems, we would expect to have hit them by now.
>>>>>
>>>>>      The *only* difference between 0.8.<latest> and 0.9.<latest> at this point is that we have dropped the old mock setuid wrapper and now use the consolehelper subsystem. For this, you will notice new /etc/pam.d/mock, /etc/consolehelper/mock files which configure mock. The default config is set up to operate exactly the same as the old 0.8 branch: ie. you must be a member of the 'mock' group to run mock. Additionally, with consolehelper comes one new feature: if you are not in the 'mock' group, you will be prompted to enter the root password and it will run. This means you can run mock without worrying about any pre-setup.
>>>>>
>>>> Do any changes, fixes, etc need to be done for EPEL since they are
>>>> basically F-3/F-6?
>>> We need to pull mock from EPEL 4, I havent put in the request for that
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure that clark put in the update for epel5 to migrate it to
>>> the latest as well (since that is what is being used on the fedora build
>>> systems.) Clark?
>>> --
>>> Michael
>>>
>> The only requests I see in bodhi are the f7/f8 ones; same in koji. I did not build or
>> push E-4 or E-5.
>>
>> Sounds like we (we == I) need to do so?
> 
> EPEL 5 doesnt use bhodi/koji, it uses plague. If you can push it, that
> would be great. If not, I still have the required client stuff installed
> to do an EPEL 5 push.
> --
> Michael
> 

Ugh, when we went to koji, I dropped that stuff like, well, the plague.

If you still have it, please do a EPEL 5 push. I'll see about getting plague-client
and whatever it needs back on my box so I can do them too.

Sorry I dropped the ball on EPEL.

Clark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkfZn/IACgkQHyuj/+TTEp1bAQCffYG2wTtXG7YVN9GAkp5xiWFo
jY8AoNnwuRsbrTTJFYsyOr92M9X/J+YB
=J+CJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux