Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:54:54 +0000
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:50:15PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 03/10/2008 02:36 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:15 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
People should file bugs instead of just posting a comment in Bodhi.
Bodhi does not provide the same features as bugzilla for tracking
problems -- for example this weekend we had one person in Bodhi
posting the same -1 karma message three times in a row...
Why not both? Reference the bug in a karma posting.
Negative karma postings should require a bug number...
Absolutely. We shouldn't be using Bohdi to track bugs against updates - they
should all be in BZ. And if we're going to allow -ve karma to revert a bug
fix, then it must be accompanied by a bug report indicating what's wrong.
I've filed an RFE for this:
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/181
josh
This might be better overall, but I just want to point out it is definitely
going to increase the barrier of getting people to use bodhi, which (due to this
thread) is apparently not being used by testers enough as it is.
I would think it is better to have a field users *may* add a bug number to their
comment, so those with the motivation do, but requiring it is probably going to
reduce the negative karma postings.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
