Re: default partition scheme without /home - why ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:06:56PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:31:25AM -0500, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
>>> I can think of a good reason for a separate /home:  upgrade paths.  I 
>>> know we are getting better at it, but it can still be problematic if one 
>>> tries to install over a previous installation, and it is usually pretty 
>>> smooth to just format / while leaving /home intact.
>>
>> +1
>
> But that means you need to guess relative sizes for / and /home or offer 
> some understandable choices.

Not if you make it dead-easy to resize LVM partitions.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux