Re: default partition scheme without /home - why ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 10 March 2008 12:08:18 Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> People can always resize / later and add a /home.  Every system needs a
> / but not every system needs a /home.  Is there a strong technical
> reason for a default /home?  Would that same reason also apply toward a
> separate /usr and /var and /var/tmp?  Please, lets not get nostalgic for
> SunOS 4 partitioning!
>

I can think of a good reason for a separate /home:  upgrade paths.  I know we 
are getting better at it, but it can still be problematic if one tries to 
install over a previous installation, and it is usually pretty smooth to just 
format / while leaving /home intact.

-- Benjamin Kreuter



-- 
Message sent on: Mon Mar 10 12:26:38 EDT 2008

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux