[...] >> Thanks, but it seems that the report was re-ordered for a couple of >> days, but it has now reverted back to the broken deps being at the >> end. >> >> All the feedback on this list was positive about the change (and >> indeed seems to have raised the general level of awareness of broken >> deps as evidenced by the followup posts about broken deps), so I'm >> wondering why it was reverted? > > I would imagine it was never changed in code yet, so not reverted either. Ah, I see. I didn't realize that it had been mailed manually for several days more than just the day that Jesse mentioned. > Andrew Farris wrote: AF> But personally.. I'd still like to see the 'new packages' section AF> at the very top as well because for the most part users will not AF> be aware of these packages to test them if they are not AF> highlighted in that way. I think from the standpoint of getting AF> best testing feedback, the best ordering would be: AF> *new packages AF> *broken deps AF> *changes That seems like a sensible compromise. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
