Andrew Farris wrote:
Alex Lancaster wrote:
"JK" == Jesse Keating writes:
JK> On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 03:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
I wonder if the formatting of the rawhide reports could be altered
slightly to show the broken deps *first* before the list of new and
updated packages? This way the current state of the brokenness (or
otherwise) of rawhide is more obvious to all maintainers, currently
you have to scroll to the end of the report to see it.
JK> Since I had to do the mail by hand today, I re-ordered it like you
JK> suggested, so that we could get more feedback on it.
Thanks, but it seems that the report was re-ordered for a couple of
days, but it has now reverted back to the broken deps being at the
end.
All the feedback on this list was positive about the change (and
indeed seems to have raised the general level of awareness of broken
deps as evidenced by the followup posts about broken deps), so I'm
wondering why it was reverted?
I would imagine it was never changed in code yet, so not reverted either.
But personally.. I'd still like to see the 'new packages' section at the very
top as well because for the most part users will not be aware of these packages
to test them if they are not highlighted in that way. I think from the
standpoint of getting best testing feedback, the best ordering would be:
*new packages
*broken deps
*changes
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
