On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 22:03 +0100, Mark wrote: > 2008/3/8, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > My opinion is that this should be decided by the the nautilus maintainer > > or the desktop team. > > Are you sure? Yeah, pretty much. I really don't think FESCo should be getting in the practice of micro-managing packages like this. In my opinion, the people best suited to make this decision would be our maintainers and upstream. Regardless though, if other FESCo members feel differently, I can always add it to our schedule. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
