On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the detailed constructive response! Yes, I agree this is a > crucial point. The srpm would no longer be the "preferred form of > modification" to use GPL terminology. <snip> > So I think the project is already heading in > the direction of using the pkgcvs as the primary/preferred source > format. As a Board member, this is indeed something I like to see us get to. Being able to get to a point where everyone feels comfortable with working within cvs (or whatever we use for code control) to meet our (as a project) source distribution requirements for any binary we make available through our build system. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
