On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:46:53 -0600 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > As for the other points, if we can't provide (and document) the > > ability for developers to test on a secondary arch, that arch > > needs to be removed from Fedora completely. It's useless to > > expect developers to magically fix things they can't debug. > > Hm, good point. My initial reaction to all this was "building on other > arches finds good bugs" and I thought back fondly on my e2fsprogs bug > from last week... then I rembered that I, too, have a magic incantation > to invoke a ppc login somewhere and without that I would have been > stumped a lot longer. If most fedora devels can't get access to one of > these boxes, it's a problem, isn't it... :( It's not a problem at all. David has repeatedly said, on this list, if you email him a public ssh key he will give you an account on a ppc64 box. There might be another alternative soon, but it's beyond my control so I'm not going to elaborate on it. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
