On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As far as I remember, "P2P is OK while it does not have any points to > the illegal content" (Tom "spot" Callaway (c) , isn't it? :) ) > > Besides the Torrent, Gnutella is already supported (gtk-gnutella, > gift-gnutella), and so on. Make sure that the rpm package does not > include any illegal stuff and has not any links to questionable and > legal-dangerous servers. I thought this was settled as well. Is edonkey technology any different then gnutella? Other than having a far less interesting name. Aren't they both designed to do the same sort of distributed network? If you can explain the difference between edonkey and gnutella, then we'll have a much better idea of if edonkey crosses a line that gnutella does not. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
