On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 22:34 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > 2008/2/27 Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:35 +0100, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: > > > > > I don't think we should package extensions, but what do you think about > > > that situation in U? > > > > Aside from the issues already mentioned in this thread, I think other > > reasons to have them packaged is _trust_ and _quality_. > > > > For example, would you install the extension from a website which you're > > not familiar with...or would you install it from the same place from > > where you install every other software on your computer? > > > So addons.mozilla.org is less trustable than the random Fedora mirror? When the signature is verified, I would trust a fedora mirror more than mozilla.org. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
