Re: sense of packaging firefox' addons?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/2/27 Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:35 +0100, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
>
> > I don't think we should package extensions, but what do you think about
>  > that situation in U?
>
>  Aside from the issues already mentioned in this thread, I think other
>  reasons to have them packaged is _trust_ and _quality_.
>
>  For example, would you install the extension from a website which you're
>  not familiar with...or would you install it from the same place from
>  where you install every other software on your computer?


So addons.mozilla.org is less trustable than the random Fedora mirror?
Because, last I check it is the only source which is enabled for
addons by default.


-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux