On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Additionally it is not only a per-user issue... it is a per-profile issue, which > a firefox user may have several of (I personally have several of them for my > main user account just for testing purposes). Indeed..complicated...very very complicated. A very different animal than perl and cpan. And...do we need to consider how system wide plugins will affect other xulrunner applications besided firefox? I'm not really up to speed on how these things interact. I know just enough to know I'm concerned about knowing what the answer to that question is before we do anything with regard to system wide plugins. I'm somewhat sure there isn't a problem here, but I want to make sure. If we did anything with regard to this, I don't think I could stomach seeing any experimentation here until after f9 goes out and rawhide reopens for general crackrock accumulation. Even then I'd want to see a discussion run through the much smarter than me people in fesco and/or packaging before we did anything...if we do anything at all. And of course the firefox maintainer(s) would need to weigh in....again. I need to go list spelunking to see what expert opinion was on this in previous discussions. I'm sure there were previous discussions at some point about this. -jef -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
