Re: sense of packaging firefox' addons?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  The builtin firefox addon update system works far faster for most desktop users
>  than getting a new rpm packaged, built, and shipped... the popular addons become
>  available for users almost as soon as the upstream posts them to the mozilla
>  addon site.  You just restart the browser and you've got a notice of update.


What about... Fedora livecd spins?  Would it make sense to put in
end-user oriented plugins in our repository so that the people making
spins can make use of them in the live image experiences?

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux