Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: > But that doesn't answer my question, the LSB compliant special comment > blocks with requires and provides where needed for another init replacement > (I think it was initng), since we are not going to use that, is it still > wanted / necessary to add LSB style comment blocks to initscripts, or can > all the initscript review bugs be closed? You *can* add them, but... > And if they cannot be closed, do we (finally) have some guidelines on > various problems which turned up when these bugs where orignally filed? Under the implementation we have (both with upstart and sysvinit), these requires and provides are mapped into a static priority system. Any issues arising from that haven't changed, and can't be fixed without more significant changes (not to the scripts, but to the infrastructure that runs them.) Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
