Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said:
Hi all,
Quite some time ago there were many bugs opened for the initscripts of many
packages to be reviewed and have lsb compliant commentary added, as
described here:
http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/initscrcomconv.html
These bugs where filed because an init replacement with which some where
experimenting needed these, are these bugs still relevant now that we are
going with upstart?
I would not recommend moving scripts to upstart at this time.
Ok,
But that doesn't answer my question, the LSB compliant special comment blocks
with requires and provides where needed for another init replacement (I think
it was initng), since we are not going to use that, is it still wanted /
necessary to add LSB style comment blocks to initscripts, or can all the
initscript review bugs be closed?
And if they cannot be closed, do we (finally) have some guidelines on various
problems which turned up when these bugs where orignally filed?
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
