-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Valent Turkovic wrote: > 2008/2/20 Benjamin Kreuter <ben.kreuter@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wednesday 20 February 2008 05:45:47 Valent Turkovic wrote: >> > >> > If this arguments are true for Fedora 8 than it looks like that more >> > people dislike selinux than like it, right? >> >> It is also possible that they had not enabled SELinux in the past, and never >> had time to enable it in more recent Fedora releases. Enabling SELinux for >> the first time requires the entire filesystem to be scanned, and for some >> people who have large disks and have been using their system for a while, >> that could be a hassle, so they may choose to not do it. >> >> Also remember that these stats do not represent an unbiased sample, and should >> not be taken to be an indication of the broad Fedora user base. >> > > Are you telling this stats are useless? Or only that everybody can > interpret them as they wish? (which is the same as being useless?) > > I'm really confused... > > I think the stats are developing. Currently we are not providing enough information to make a real good interpretation of the data. 50 % of all machines that smolt has ever collected data for report they have selinux _enabled. This does not mean the other 50% reported that they have it disabled, just that they have not reported that it is enabled. :^( I sound like a politician. Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics. And yes Valent has been working with us to repair problems in SELinux. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAke/SQcACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMEACeKDPD9WlxSNtvG/S0MJB63BLF o+UAn2MH805WieRoUeZ9xOr9Wo8jKIES =KKVU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
