Re: Incompatible Unison update (and solution?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michel Salim wrote:
> Wouldn't the remote unison be expecting the binary to be called
> unison? To make the compat-* operation seamless, /all/ unison packages
> might have to use the alternatives system.

Unison already supports the option "addversionno" which will attempt to
run e.g. "unison-2.13" instead of plain "unison". Thus, if you install
the compatibility package on a server, your client scripts will have to
make this minor change. If you (only) install the compatibility package
on a client, no changes are required.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux